Stop The Wall!
The Grassroots Palestinian Anti-Apartheid Wall CampaignGet E-mail Updates|Use Our Site|Contact Us

International Law
International Law

Campaign Documents on International Law
International Law, The Grassroots Palestinian Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign, September 10th, 2002

This section contains all documents issued by the Palestinian Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign regarding International Law, the International Court of Justice and the relevant UN resolutions including:
  • Press releases & Calls to Action
  • Fact Sheet
  • Analysis

Press Releases and Calls to Action


The International Court of Justice Declares: THE WALL IS ILLEGAL!
Latest News, PENGON/Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign
July 9th, 2004 --
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the Hague, despite intense pressure from Israel, the US and EU Governments, confirms what Palestinians and the world have known since the beginning of its planning and construction - THE WALL IS ILLEGAL! The ICJ Advisory Opinion clearly calls for a complete stop and reversal of the Wall. In response to the ICJ opinion, the Palestinian Grassroots Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign is calling for immediate action: Construction on the Wall must be stopped immediately, all existing sections must be dismantled and compensation must be offered to those who have suffered from its devastation. [MORE]

Call for Action On the One Year Anniversary of the ICJ
Worldwide Activism, The Grassroots Palestinian Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign
June 16th, 2005 --
As the Apartheid Wall continues to imprison the Palestinian people in ghettos and to steal and raze their land, the 9th of July will see massive popular resistance to the Apartheid Wall staged by the Campaign’s popular committees across Palestine. [MORE]

July 9 & 10: Days of Action: "We Demand Justice for Palestine Now!"
Call to Action, PENGON/Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign

July 9th, 2004 -- Since the beginning of the construction of the Apartheid Wall in June 2002, Palestinians have been protesting against it and international organizations have repeatedly highlighted ways in which the Wall violates Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law. Ongoing Palestinian pressure, supported by international censure pushed the United Nations General Assembly on December 8 2003 to pass a resolution requesting that the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague give an Advisory Opinion on the "legality" of the Wall. Hearings were thus held in the Hague in February 2004. On the 9th of July, 3 pm, the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice will be issued. The Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign asks that the world remain critical and expose the political implications of the ICJ decision - whatever its content may be -to support us in raising up the Palestinian voice to the world's public opinion. To this end we are calling for Days of Action on the 9th &10th of July. We are urging you to support our efforts and make our voices heard! [MORE]


In Palestine and Worldwide: Popular Hearings and Demonstrations against the Wall as ICJ in The Hague Hears Oral Arguments
Press Release, PENGON/Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign
February 7th, 2004 -- As a national and international call by the Palestinian Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign, February 21-23 will mark worldwide solidarity with the Palestinian call for justice in the case of the Apartheid Wall being built inside the West Bank. In an attempt to raise greater awareness worldwide, and to highlight the importance of the case, popular hearings that will detail the illegality of the Wall will be held in various cities worldwide. At the same time, solidarity groups are planning demonstrations to ensure greater exposure for the issue and make clear to their governments popular opposition to the Wall. [MORE]

We Demand Justice for Palestine! Make the Wall Fall!
Latest News, PENGON/Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign
February 7th, 2004 -- On the occasion of the Hearing on the Wall at the International Court of Justice in The Hague, PENGON/ Palestinian Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign calls upon all groups, networks and movements to raise their voice against this crime and denounce the illegal Wall. As the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague will hear arguments and testimonies on the Wall on February 23, there is an urgent need to make clear the popular, worldwide disapproval for the illegal Wall and need of the international community to take responsibility for what has already been declared illegal numerous times by the United Nations. There is serious concern in Palestine, and for all justice-seekers, that pressure on the Court and on others to prevent a swift or fair ruling against the Wall is taking place intensively as Israel’s concern for the outcome of the ICJ hearing increases. And meanwhile, the construction of the Wall continues on a daily basis. [MORE]


Fact Sheet:


Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign Fact Sheet
The Wall and International Law

Israel’s construction of the Apartheid Wall in the West Bank constitutes a grave violation of human rights and international law. The Apartheid Wall will result in the unilateral demarcation of a new border in the West Bank and the effective annexation of occupied land. Other violations of international law include collective punishment of the civilian population, the seizing of private property by an occupying power, the demolition of houses and property, and the violation of such basic human rights as the right to work and freedom of movement. In this fact sheet, which analyzes the Wall and its impact in the context of international humanitarian and human rights law, is an important resource for making clear that the Wall’s illegality cannot be denied. Download in PDF [1 MB].


Analysis:


Mobilization and Momentum are the Only Ways to Ensure that the Sole De Facto Victor is not the International System
Analysis, PENGON/Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign
July 29th, 2004 -- No doubt, expectations in Palestine - and among its supporters - had been low in regards to the International Court of Justice "Advisory Opinion. " The Court, as the United Nations as a whole, was expected to fall substantially short in its decision. With the continued failure of the UN in relation to Palestinian rights and self-determination, the decision or opinion was understood as predominantly public relations. With the continued malleability of the law based on Israeli, US and European interest, it was expected that the Court would take an even more conservative approach than the General Assembly, which often time seeks to reflect popular international sentiment in support of the Palestinian struggle. [MORE]

One year after the ICJ – The G8 and World Bank Cementing Israeli Apartheid and Occupation
Analysis, The Grassroots Palestinian Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign
July 7th, 2005 -- As world leaders gather in Scotland for the G8 summit, the Palestinian people and solidarity groups across the world will mark the first anniversary of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruling on the Apartheid Wall. The court, having taken up the popular appeals from Palestine, stipulated that the Wall is illegal and must be dismantled while directing the international community “not to render aid or assistance in maintaining the situation created by [the Wall’s] construction”. In the latest campaign analysis we unravel the complicity and support of the international community for the Apartheid Wall and Occupation's project of expelling the Palestinian people from their lands. [MORE]

The Wall Is Illegal, Now We Must Stop It
Jamal Juma', PENGON/Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign
February 21st, 2004 -- The Israeli wall in the Occupied West Bank is almost one-third complete, a year and a half after construction began. It snakes deep inside the West Bank, devouring fertile land into de facto Israeli-controlled areas, encircling residential areas and ghettoizing the Palestinian population. That the Wall is a violation of international law is not new. [MORE]

THE WALL AND INTERNATIONAL LAW
Víctor de Currea-Lugo, PENGON / Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign
January 7th, 2004 -- The Apartheid Wall is justified by the Israeli government in front of the international media as a means of preventing attacks on Israel while developing a strong campaign to justify the Wall and to show its “advantages”. In reality, the origin of the idea of the Wall did not coincide with these attacks but have been a part of Sharon’s plans for many years. The expression “for security reasons” instead has been adopted by Israel to justify this and other measures against the Palestinian people, even if contrary to international law. The Wall is clearly illegal according to international human rights law and international humanitarian law (IHL). This article shows the Wall’s illegality through two main dimensions—one the Wall itself, and two its consequences and violation to Palestinian rights. Download the article in PDF [77 KB]. [DOWNLOAD FILE]

Real Victories are Tangible: UN Resolution on the Wall Further Highlights International Agency’s Weaknesses
Analysis, PENGON/Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign
October 23rd, 2003 -- The October 21 passing of the United Nations General Assembly resolution calling upon Israel to “stop and reverse” the Apartheid Wall is being hailed by some as a mark of success for justice in Palestine or a noteworthy step in tearing the Wall down. But, praise and relief for the UN decision should be seen as misguided, as a reading of the text finds that the Resolution presents the issue within a framework that denies the fundamental distinction between Occupied and Occupier. [MORE]

"Dismantling" and "Adjustments" in the Wall's Path an Israeli Media Game, Wall's Strangulation Continues Unhindered
Latest News, PENGON/Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign
February 23rd, 2004 -- As the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague hears Oral Arguments in the case against the Wall, the Israelis have decided they will not participate in the Hearing, aware that there is nothing legitimate--or legal--about the Wall. Instead, parallel Israeli efforts to undermine the case against the Wall were well underway from the start, including arguments that the political nature of the Wall should prevent the court from hearing the case. In the end, the media is an Israeli dominated arena where much of its political agenda plays itself out. MORE]

The Wall in Palestine and the European Union
Victor de Currea-Lugo, Legal Advisor, Palestinian "Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign"
February 21st, 2004 -- We believed in the power of the law when our Campaign received news of the United Nations General Assembly Resolution in October 2003. The Resolution demanded that Israel stop construction of the Wall and demolish the existing sections within one month’s time. We believed, but conditionally, since Israel’s violation of international law and the UN resolutions is continuous and unhindered. [MORE]


EXPLORE THE ISSUE
  • Search for more about on this site.


    RECENT SITE ADDITIONS
  • Derail Alstom - Saudi Arabia deal (August 7th, 2008)
  • Ni’lin and people across the West Bank fulfill pledge to Ahmad Mousa: protests continue unabated (August 2nd, 2008)
  • Ni'lin lays Ahmad Mousa to rest (August 1st, 2008)
  • Second youth targeted in two days: Yousef Amira (17) from Ni’lin mortally wounded (July 31st, 2008)
  • Ahmad Mousa, 12 year old boy, murdered in Ni’lin by the Occupation (July 29th, 2008)
  • A change in the route of the Apartheid Wall near Jayyus sanctions the land confiscation (July 28th, 2008)
  • Al Ma'sra: Summer camps join the struggle against the Wall (July 25th, 2008)





  • SITE SECTIONS
  • Home
  • The Campaign
  • Activist Resources
  • Analysis/Features
  • Boycott Section
  • Community Voices
  • Fact Sheets
  • FAQs
  • International Law
  • Latest News
  • Views & Opinions
  • Maps
  • Photos
  • Video Footage
  • Worldwide Activism


    E-NEWSLETTER
    Enter your email to receive our weekly E-Newsletter

    SEARCH THE SITE


    Advanced Search


    GET THE BOOK!
    Stop The Wall book

  • Print this pageE-mail this page

    The Grassroots Palestinian Anti-Apartheid Wall CampaignSupport The Campaign|Donate|Contact Us




    site design by nigelparry.net